McCarthy v. Odell

202 A.D. 784
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 A.D. 784 (McCarthy v. Odell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarthy v. Odell, 202 A.D. 784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that it was reversible error for the trial justice, after the jury had been out for twenty-four hours, to say to them upon their return to the court room, “ Juries are selected, not to disagree, but to agree, and all this time has been wasted unless the jury comes to an agreement. It is not likely that we will have in this county a jury as competent and as impartial to try this case as you are.” That the effect of such remarks was to improperly coerce the jury and resulted in their agreeing upon a verdict within ten minutes thereafter. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Voeckell
210 P.2d 972 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D. 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-odell-nyappdiv-1922.