McCarthy v. McGinnis

76 Mo. 344
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 76 Mo. 344 (McCarthy v. McGinnis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarthy v. McGinnis, 76 Mo. 344 (Mo. 1882).

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

It is conceded that the motion for a new trial is not incorporated in the bill of exceptions This is a fatal defect, so far as concerns anything which occurred during the progress of the trial and necessary to be preserved in the bill of exceptions. And our statute regarding practice in civil cases recognizes no distinction in this regard between proceedings of an equitable nature and those which seek the enforcement of some right strictly legal. We do not feel authorized to make a distinction in this regard which the legislature have not made, and thus engraft upon the statute an unwarranted exception. Discovering no error in the record proper, we affirm the judgment.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reynolds v. Citizens' Railway Co.
47 S.W. 895 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
State v. Steen
22 S.W. 461 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
State v. Griffin
98 Mo. 672 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Mo. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-mcginnis-mo-1882.