McCarthy v. Marmor
692 So. 2d 224, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3252, 1997 WL 163585
This text of 692 So. 2d 224 (McCarthy v. Marmor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCarthy v. Marmor, 692 So. 2d 224, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3252, 1997 WL 163585 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
Opinion
The trial court’s grant of summary judgment was correct, but not for the reason implicitly stated in the order. We conclude that the statute of limitations bars the claim in suit. Accordingly we affirm on the basis of Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
692 So. 2d 224, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3252, 1997 WL 163585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-marmor-fladistctapp-1997.