McCarthy v. James Rowland & Co.
This text of 85 N.Y.S. 327 (McCarthy v. James Rowland & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for conversion of two books the justice has awarded judgment to the plaintiff for the possession of the chattels, together with $50 damages. There having been no amendment of the proceedings to cover such a result, it is impossible to sustain the judgment. Possession as well as damages (not in the alternative) having been awarded, the damages must be deemed to relate to detention, not to the measure of value, and, eliminating the provision for possession, we cannot properly affirm the judgment, nor do we understand that the respondent desires an affirmance with this modification.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 N.Y.S. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-james-rowland-co-nyappterm-1903.