McCarthy v. Huggler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCarthy v. Huggler

83 N.Y.S. 1110

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 83 N.Y.S. 1110 (McCarthy v. Huggler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCarthy v. Huggler, 83 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the complaint states a cause of action against the defendant for enticing away the plaintiff’s husband and enticing him to permanently desert her, but whether or not the evidence was sufficient to establish such alleged cause of action was a question of fact for the jury, and that the alleged cause of action was not barred by the statute of limitations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the complaint states a cause of action against the defendant for enticing away the plaintiff’s husband and enticing him to permanently desert her, but whether or not the evidence was sufficient to establish such alleged cause of action was a question of fact for the jury, and that the alleged cause of action was not barred by the statute of limitations.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-huggler-nyappdiv-1903.