McCarthy v. Huggler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCarthy v. Huggler

83 N.Y.S. 1110

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 7, 1903·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the complaint states a cause of action against the defendant for enticing away the plaintiff’s husband and enticing him to permanently desert her, but whether or not the evidence was sufficient to establish such alleged cause of action was a question of fact for the jury, and that the alleged cause of action was not barred by the statute of limitations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the complaint states a cause of action against the defendant for enticing away the plaintiff’s husband and enticing him to permanently desert her, but whether or not the evidence was sufficient to establish such alleged cause of action was a question of fact for the jury, and that the alleged cause of action was not barred by the statute of limitations.

McCarthy v. Huggler, 83 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

83 N.Y.S. 1110 (McCarthy v. Huggler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.