McCarthy v. Fleischmann Bros.

125 N.Y.S. 1129
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 8, 1910·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no evidence that defendant Rapp Construction Company was in control of the stairway, and no evidence of negligence on its part sufficient to sustain the verdict in favor of the plaintiff against it. As to this defendant, therefore, the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. As to the defendant Fleischmann Bros. Company the judgment finds ample support in the evidence, and is affirmed. Dougherty v. Weeks, 126 App. Div. 786, 111 N. Y. Supp. 218. Judgment reversed as to the defendant Rapp Construction Company and a new trial ordered, with costs "to appellant to abide the event. As to the defendant Fleischmann Bros. Company, judgment affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy v. Fleischmann Bros., 125 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

125 N.Y.S. 1129 (McCarthy v. Fleischmann Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dougherty v. D. C. Weeks & Son
126 A.D. 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)