McCarthy v. Cutter

Supreme Court of New Jersey

McCarthy v. Cutter

75 A. 897, 76 N.J. Eq. 616, 6 Buchanan 616, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 252

DecidedFebruary 28, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 75 A. 897 (McCarthy v. Cutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCarthy v. Cutter, 75 A. 897, 76 N.J. Eq. 616, 6 Buchanan 616, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 252 (N.J. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree directing the appellants, who are executors and trustees under the will of Samuel Dally, deceased, to render an account of their stewardship. Dally died in 1895. The complainant, by the terms of his will, is entitled to one-fourth of the income of his residuary estate. Fo account at all was filed by the appellants from the time of his death until the year 1903, and no account has been filed by them since the latter date. They have made but one payment to the complainant under the residuary devise to her. That payment was made in December, 1900, and amounted to $90. The right of the complainant to an accounting under these [617]*617circumstances is so plain that no attempt.has been made by the appellants to support their appeal, either by printed brief or oral argument. It has practically been abandoned, and should never have been taken.

The decree brought up by the appeal will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon—15.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree directing the appellants, who are executors and trustees under the will of Samuel Dally, deceased, to render an account of their stewardship. Dally died in 1895. The complainant, by the terms of his will, is entitled to one-fourth of the income of his residuary estate. Fo account at all was filed by the appellants from the time of his death until the year 1903, and no account has been filed by them since the latter date. They have made but one payment to the complainant under the residuary devise to her. That payment was made in December, 1900, and amounted to $90. The right of the complainant to an accounting under these [617]*617circumstances is so plain that no attempt.has been made by the appellants to support their appeal, either by printed brief or oral argument. It has practically been abandoned, and should never have been taken.

The decree brought up by the appeal will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon—15.

For reversal—None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A. 897, 76 N.J. Eq. 616, 6 Buchanan 616, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-cutter-nj-1910.