McCarthy v. Brainard

6 A.D.2d 1029, 178 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4642
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The question here is limited to whether the Commissioner of Welfare is entitled to reimbursement for the cost of maintaining the dependents of this incompetent [1030]*1030after the appointment of the committee and until the time of the application. We hold that if the estate of the incompetent is sufficiently large there is no reason why his obligation to support his dependents should not be enforced. The Federal statute (U. S. Code, tit. 38, § 3001, subd. [a]) does not prohibit recovery in such a ease. However, we feel that the estate of this incompetent is hardly enough to provide for the incompetent’s needs in the event of contingencies affecting his welfare. In the circumstances the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy v. Brainard, 6 A.D.2d 1029, 178 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4642 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

6 A.D.2d 1029 (McCarthy v. Brainard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Dugan
29 Misc. 2d 980 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1961)