McCarthy v. Board of Education

188 A.D. 930
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1919·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order granting motion for alternative writ of mandamus reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Since the decision of the Special Term the precise question presented has been decided adversely to the relator’s claim in the First Department, where it was held that the board of education has power to transfer janitor-engineers from one school to another, “ and if that power, used in the exercise of its sound judgment, put the relator in a building where his net compensation was reduced, he cannot complain. [931] Where a single grade in the classified service has compensation varying with the extent and character of the services to be rendered and the responsibilities to be undertaken, no one in that classification can complain if his financial return varies as his assignment changes.” (Matter of Crosby v. Board of Education, 187 App. Div. 205.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy v. Board of Education, 188 A.D. 930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

188 A.D. 930 (McCarthy v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prendergast v. Board of Education
192 Misc. 376 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Crispell v. Rust
149 Misc. 464 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)
O'Connor v. Emerson
196 A.D. 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)