McCarthy v. Armstrong

23 Misc. 2d 912, 201 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3127
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 21, 1960·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff was entitled to recovery of all overcharges from July 1, 1956 to June 30, 1957, since the 1957 amendment is applicable to rights which accrued prior to its enactment but which had not expired when it became effective. [913] In accordance with the legislative intent, the period of limitation must be construed to have been extended to two years from the date of the occurrence of the violation (see Denkensohn v. Ridgeway Apts., 13 Misc 2d 389; Hopkins v. Lincoln Trust Co., 233 N. Y. 213).

The judgment and order should be modified to the extent of granting recovery to plaintiff of all overcharges from July 1, 1956 to June 30, 1957, and as modified affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant.

Concur — Stetter, J. P., Hofstadteb and Hecht, JJ.

Judgment and order modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy v. Armstrong, 23 Misc. 2d 912, 201 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

23 Misc. 2d 912 (McCarthy v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopkins v. . Lincoln Trust Co.
135 N.E. 267 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Denkensohn v. Ridgway Apartments, Inc.
13 Misc. 2d 389 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)