McCarthy & McCarthy, Inc. v. Southeast Bank, N.A.
489 So. 2d 1195, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1274, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8155
Opinion
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings on the authority of Finkelstein v. Southeast Bank, 490 So.2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). There is a lack of evidence in the record below supporting the entry of an injunction freezing the bank accounts of the appellants because those accounts contain funds allegedly fraudulently secured from the appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCarthy & McCarthy, Inc. v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 489 So. 2d 1195, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1274, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8155 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
489 So. 2d 1195 (McCarthy & McCarthy, Inc. v. Southeast Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Finkelstein v. Southeast Bank, NA
490 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)