McCarthy ex rel. Estate of Vogel Van & Storage, Inc. v. Navistar Financial Corp.
This text of 142 F.3d 571 (McCarthy ex rel. Estate of Vogel Van & Storage, Inc. v. Navistar Financial Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William M. McCarthy, trustee for the estate of Vogel Van & Storage, Inc. (“Vogel Van”), appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, affirming the bankruptcy court’s conclusion that a payment by Vogel Van to appellees was made in the ordinary course of business for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(2) and was therefore not avoidable as a preferential transfer pursuant to Section 547(b). We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Scullin’s opinion. In re Vogel Van & Storage, Inc., 210 B.R. 27, 34-37 (N.D.N.Y.1997).
Because we agree with Judge Scullin that Vogel Van’s payment was made in the ordinary course of business, we do not reach appellees’ assertion on cross-appeal that Key Bank, a creditor of Vogel Van, was not entitled under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) to pursue, on behalf of the bankruptcy estate, the appeal from the bankruptcy court’s judgment.
We therefore affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 F.3d 571, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8013, 1998 WL 203035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-ex-rel-estate-of-vogel-van-storage-inc-v-navistar-financial-ca2-1998.