McCarter v. West

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 28, 1997
Docket96-3040
StatusPublished

This text of McCarter v. West (McCarter v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarter v. West, (10th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH JAN 28 1997 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk

LORNA L. McCARTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 96-3040 v.

TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary of the Army,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Kansas (D.C. No. 94-CV-2383)

Submitted on the briefs:

Jeffrey L. Baxter, of Chapman, Waters & Baxter, of Leavenworth, Kansas, for the appellant.

Jackie N. Williams, United States Attorney, and Janice Miller Karlin, Assistant United States Attorney, State of Kansas, for the appellee.

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Lorna McCarter appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in

favor of defendant Togo West, Jr., Secretary of the Army, on her claims of sex-based and

disability-based employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 and § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act.

We review the district court's decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Wolf

v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 50 F.3d 793, 796 (10th Cir. 1995). After careful

examination of the record, we conclude the analysis and conclusions set forth in the

district court's memorandum and order granting summary judgment are correct and that

plaintiff's challenge to the decision lacks merit. We therefore adopt the district court's

memorandum and order, McCarter v. West, 910 F. Supp. 519 (D. Kan. 1995), as the

opinion of this court. See Herrera v. International Union, 73 F.3d 1056, 1057 (10th Cir.

1996) (adopting district court's opinion as opinion of court of appeals).

Defendant's motion to strike portions of plaintiff's appendix is GRANTED.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herrera v. International Union
73 F.3d 1056 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
McCarter v. West
910 F. Supp. 519 (D. Kansas, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McCarter v. West, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarter-v-west-ca10-1997.