McCarter v. Lavery

164 N.W. 1054, 101 Neb. 748, 1917 Neb. LEXIS 177
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 3, 1917
DocketNo. 19679
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 164 N.W. 1054 (McCarter v. Lavery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarter v. Lavery, 164 N.W. 1054, 101 Neb. 748, 1917 Neb. LEXIS 177 (Neb. 1917).

Opinion

Rose, J.

This is a proceeding by a taxpayer to remove from office a county commissioner of Dawson county “for corruption” and “for wilful maladministration” — two statutory grounds. Rev. St. 1913, sec. 5698. Approval of excessive claims against- the county and misconduct resulting in their allowance and payment are the foundations of plaintiff’s charges. From a dismissal of the proceeding after a trial on the merits, plaintiff has appealed.

The appeal will not be determined. The purpose of the proceeding is to oust defendant from office. His term has long since expired and the office is now occupied by his successor. No effort to advance the appeal for a decision during the incumbency of defendant was made. The delay is not attributable to him. He made a successful defense in the trial court. Being out of office he cannot now be removed therefrom. His retirement at the expiration of his official term pending the appeal was an event making it impossible for the appellate court to grant plaintiff any effectual relief on the cause of action pleaded. That event is a ground for dismissing the [750]*750appeal, and, when not appearing on the record, may be shown by extrinsic evidence. Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651. The change in officers is asserted by defendant, and not denied. Courts properly decline to express an opinion on a mere abstraction, and may act on their own motion in dismissing an appeal involving only an inquiry of. that nature. Heesch v. Snyder, 85 Neb. 778.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Crete v. County of Saline
332 N.W.2d 926 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
Henderson v. School Dist. of Scottsbluff
173 N.W.2d 32 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1969)
State Ex Rel. Coulter v. McFarland
88 N.W.2d 892 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1958)
Hafeman v. Gem Oil Company
80 N.W.2d 139 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1956)
Scott v. Ward
54 P.2d 805 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1936)
Dodge Agricultural Credit Ass'n v. Tighe
237 N.W. 404 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1931)
State ex rel. Spillman v. Dunbar State Bank
230 N.W. 452 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 N.W. 1054, 101 Neb. 748, 1917 Neb. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarter-v-lavery-neb-1917.