McCarter v. Ketcham

62 A. 693, 72 N.J.L. 247, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 107
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 20, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 62 A. 693 (McCarter v. Ketcham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarter v. Ketcham, 62 A. 693, 72 N.J.L. 247, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 107 (N.J. 1905).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garretson, J.

On the 23d day of January, 1893, Edward S. Campfield, William S. Ketcham, William S. Ketcham, Jr., Frank D. Holloway and George W. Ketcham, signed the certificate of incorporation of the Clinton Hill Lumber and Manufacturing Company. The certificate set forth the name of the company; the place where the business of the company was to be carried on; the objects for which the company was formed being to manufacture and sell sashes, doors, blinds and all planing mill work and carpenters’ supplies, and to buy and sell lumber; the total amount of capital stock being $75,000, divided into seven hundred and fifty shares of $100 each; the amount with which the company would commence business being $40,500, being four hundred and five shares of $100 each; the names [248]*248and residences of stockholders and the number of shares held by each being one hundred shares by each of the first four named above and five shares by George W. Ketcham, and the time of the existence of the company, fifty years. This certificate was filed in the Essex county clerk’s office. The certificate was never filed in the office of the secretary of state.

On the same 23 d day of January the first meeting of the stockholders was held, at which a temporary chairman and secretary were elected. It was moved and carried that certificate of incorporation and waiver of notice of meeting be filed; by-laws were adopted and the original incorporators were elected directors.

Upon the same day tire directors met; William S. Ketcham was elected president; Edward S. Campfield, vice president; F. D. Holloway, secretary, and William S. Ketcham, Jr., treasurer; the oath of office was taken by the secretary; the treasurer was instructed to give bonds in $5,000 and procure necessary stationery; the fixing of the principal office was laid over for the present and a bill of sale was made by F. D. Holloway, one of the incorporators, to the company, said bill of sale representing what Holloway owed William S. Ketcham, another incorporator, and the property so transferred to be paid for by stock of the company, to be issued to William S. Ketcham.

By the bill of sale, dated the same 23d of January, Frank D. Holloway, in consideration of $1 paid by the Clinton Hill Lumber and Manufacturing Company, stated to be a corporation of New Jersey, sold to the company the stock of lumber then in the hands of Frank D. Holloway & Company, or in course of shipment; also lease of premises corner of Rose street and Jelliff avenue, buildings and improvements thereon, good will, accounts receivable, fixtures and everything appertaining to the business of the said Frank D. Holloway & Company. On the 6th of February, 1893, a special meeting of the stockholders, called for nine o’clock in the forenoon of that day, was adjourned to February 7th, at two o’clock in the afternoon. On the same 6th day of February a special meeting of the directors was held, at which [249]*249all were present except George W. Ketcham. The board of directors was authorized to call upon the stockholders for forty per cent, of the amount subscribed to the stock of the company, to be paid into the treasury on or before Tuesday, February 7th, and certificates be issued therefor. The resignation of F. D. Holloway as secretary and director of the company was read and accepted. W. S. Ketcham, Jr., was elected secretary in place of Holloway and the board adjourned until February 7th. On the same 6th of February a paper was signed by William S. Ketcham, Jr., treasurer, with the name of William S. Ketcham, president, to it, and with the seal of the company attached, which certifies that William S. Ketcham, Jr., is' entitled to forty shares of stock in the company.

No payment was ever made on account of the stock subscription of William S. Ketcham, Jr.

On or about March 12th, 1893, Holloway confessed judgment to Storeby, Sprague '& Compaq, and also a judgment to the Cumberland Lumber Company. The consideration for these judgments was lumber sold to him prior to January 23d, 1893. On March 16th, 1893, these judgment creditors filed a bill in Chancery against the Clinton Hill Lumber and Manufacturing Company, the object of which was to set aside the bill of sale made by Holloway to that corporation. That company filed an answer to the bill, setting up an advance of moneys to 'Holloway by William S. Ketcham, Sr.; that Holloway’s business was at a standstill for lack of capital to prosecute the same and pay the debts contracted by Holloway; that. Holloway agreed a company should be formed with capital sufficient to carry on the business; that the corporation was formed and organized; that Holloway stated that all the assets of his business had been procured with moneys advanced to him by William S. Ketcham and offered to convey all said business either to William S. Ketcham direct or to the defendant, and if made to the defendant that the defendant would issue to William S. Ketcham its stock for the value of the same as property purchased, and Ketcham agreed to accept the stock of the [250]*250company for the same; that Holloway made the hill of sale and the company issued to Ketcham its certificate of capital stock in payment of the purchase-price or value of the business and properly; that the defendant attempted to take possession of the property. The answer denies that the transfer from Holloway to the company was without consideration or was made bj^ him to delay, defeat and defraud Holloway’s creditors. This answer had attached to it an affidavit of William S. Ketcham, Jr., in which he swears that he is the secretary of the Clinton Hill Lumber and Manufacturing Company, and as to the truth of the matter in the answer.

A final decree was made in this suit November 14th, 1893, adjudging that the bill of sale be set aside as against the judgments and executions of the complainants; that Thomas N. McCarter, Jr., be appointed receiver to take possession of the property transferred by Holloway to the company by the bill of sale; that the defendant forthwith transfer to the receiver all the property as received from Holloway and convert the same into cash, to be applied to the payment of the complainants’ judgments, and report to the court; and if sufficient was not realized to pay the amounts due the complainants the receiver was given leave to apply to the court for further relief.

An appeal from this decree was taken to the Court of Errors and Appeals and the decree affirmed.

April 1st, 1895, upon petition filed by the complainants, it was ordered that the defendant pay the complainants the amounts due on their judgments and that execution issue to levy and make said sums.

Execution was issued and returned unsatisfied. April 9th, 1895, tire same complainants filed a bill against the Clinton Hill Lumber and Manufacturing Company alleging that it was insolvent and praying for the appointment of a receiver, and May 13th, 1895, Thomas N. McCarter, Jr., was appointed receiver.

The claims as above stated of the complainants against the defendant were presented to the receiver and by him [251]*251allowed, and upon appeal to the Chancellor from his allowance the determination of the receiver was affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fatzer v. Najarian
199 A. 710 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1938)
Marneil Realty Corp. v. Twin Brook Realty Corp.
179 A. 110 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Brown v. Allebach
166 F. 488 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A. 693, 72 N.J.L. 247, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarter-v-ketcham-nj-1905.