McCart v. State
207 S.W.3d 131, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1294, 2006 WL 2527865
Opinion
ORDER
Jeffrey McCart appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion based on the “escape rule.”1 Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCart v. State, 207 S.W.3d 131, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1294, 2006 WL 2527865 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
207 S.W.3d 131 (McCart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wagner v. State
172 S.W.3d 922 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)