McCarron v. Upper Peninsula Hauling Ass'n
163 N.W.2d 805, 13 Mich. App. 168, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1030
Opinions
At the close of plaintiffs’ proofs in this nonjury negligence action, the trial judge granted defendants’ motions for directed verdict on the basis no negligence had been shown. Properly, these should have been motions to dismiss under GCR 1963, 504.2, and we so treat them.
Pursuant to the requirements of GCR 1963, 504.2, the trial judge made the findings required by GCR 1963, 517.1. A review of the trial record does not persuade us that such findings are clearly erroneous.
Affirmed, with costs to defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCarron v. Upper Peninsula Hauling Ass'n, 163 N.W.2d 805, 13 Mich. App. 168, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1030 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).
163 N.W.2d 805 (McCarron v. Upper Peninsula Hauling Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merritt v. Nickelson
287 N.W.2d 178 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1980)
Jamens v. Shelby Township
200 N.W.2d 479 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1972)
Bradley v. O'Brien
183 N.W.2d 411 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1970)
Dauer v. Zabel
172 N.W.2d 701 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)