McCarron v. Philadelphia
46 Pa. Super. 151, 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 251
This text of 46 Pa. Super. 151 (McCarron v. Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCarron v. Philadelphia, 46 Pa. Super. 151, 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 251 (Pa. Ct. App. 1911).
Opinion
Opinion by
All that we deem it necessary to say in the discussion of this case has been said by the learned trial judge in his opinion overruling the motions for new trial and judgment non obstante veredicto and our opinion in the case in which Charles McCarron is plaintiff.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 Pa. Super. 151, 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarron-v-philadelphia-pasuperct-1911.