McCarr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCarr v. State

621 So. 2d 569, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7662, 1993 WL 273710

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 21, 1993

DocketNo. 91-03877

StatusPublished

This text of 621 So. 2d 569 (McCarr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCarr v. State, 621 So. 2d 569, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7662, 1993 WL 273710 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK, Chief Judge.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions and the trial court’s declaration that McCarr qualified for sentencing as a habitual felony offender. We note, however, that due to a scrivener’s error, the written sentences [570]*570for counts II and III were recorded inaccurately. We remand for conformance of the written sentences to the oral pronouncement, i.e., fifteen years for escape (count III) and five years for possession of cocaine (count II).

CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK, Chief Judge.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions and the trial court’s declaration that McCarr qualified for sentencing as a habitual felony offender. We note, however, that due to a scrivener’s error, the written sentences [570]*570for counts II and III were recorded inaccurately. We remand for conformance of the written sentences to the oral pronouncement, i.e., fifteen years for escape (count III) and five years for possession of cocaine (count II).

CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 So. 2d 569, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7662, 1993 WL 273710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarr-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.