McCarn v. . Bottling Co.

196 S.E. 837, 213 N.C. 543, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 136
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 4, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 S.E. 837 (McCarn v. . Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarn v. . Bottling Co., 196 S.E. 837, 213 N.C. 543, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 136 (N.C. 1938).

Opinion

SEAWELL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Civil action to recover of manufacturers or bottler damages resulting from drinking bottled beverage containing noxious substance.

The plaintiff purchased a crate of soda water products known as "3-Centa" from the defendant. On Sunday night, 11 July, 1937, about three hours after supper, he drank part of a bottle which came from this crate, and in one-half hour thereafter became very sick. Examination of the remaining contents of the bottle disclosed that it contained "considerable sediment and slimy-appearing substance." 3-Centa is usually a clear drink.

From judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence, he appeals, assigning error. The plaintiff's evidence is not sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Enloe v. Bottling Co., 208 N.C. 305, 180 S.E. 582, and cases cited.

Affirmed.

SEAWELL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Henderson v. Munn
99 F.2d 190 (Fourth Circuit, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 S.E. 837, 213 N.C. 543, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarn-v-bottling-co-nc-1938.