McCants v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCants v. State

648 So. 2d 319, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 150, 1995 WL 13436

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 1995

DocketNo. 93-2249

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 648 So. 2d 319 (McCants v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCants v. State, 648 So. 2d 319, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 150, 1995 WL 13436 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of resisting arrest, battery on a law enforcement officer, and possession of crack cocaine. Appellant was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes, to a total of 30 years with a five-year minimum mandatory sentence on each count, to be served consecutively.

In Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278,130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), and Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993), the Florida' Supreme Court held that a trial court may not impose consecutive enhanced sentences under section 775.084, Florida Statutes, for crimes growing out of a single-criminal episode. See also Clark v. State, 641 So.2d 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Appellant’s consecutive enhanced sentences are thus prohibited, and though the convictions are affirmed, we must vacate the sentences imposed on all counts and remand with directions that the three consecutive sentences be made concurrent with one another.

ERVIN and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI