McCann v. Tillinghast
5 N.E. 164, 140 Mass. 327, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 361
Opinion
The defendants are not liable for the as- • sault by Baily upon the plaintiff, unless it was committed by Baily while acting within the scope of his employment as a servant of the defendants. This fact is not sufficiently alleged in the declaration, and it is therefore demurrable.
Judgment for the defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCann v. Tillinghast, 5 N.E. 164, 140 Mass. 327, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 361 (Mass. 1885).
5 N.E. 164 (McCann v. Tillinghast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.
20 N.E.2d 465 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Fanciullo v. B. G. & S. Theatre Corp.
8 N.E.2d 174 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Shein v. John R. Thompson Co.
225 Ill. App. 490 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)
Crelly v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.
113 P. 386 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1911)
Klugman v. Sanitary Laundry Co.
141 Ill. App. 422 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1908)
Hardeman v. Williams
43 So. 726 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)
Belt Railway Co. v. Banicki
102 Ill. App. 642 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1902)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Adams
56 N.E. 101 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1900)
Bacon v. Hooker
54 N.E. 253 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Oakland City Agricultural & Industrial Society v. Bingham
31 N.E. 383 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)