McCann v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McCann v. State

372 S.W.3d 922, 2012 WL 3288677, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 989

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 14, 2012·No. No. WD 74054·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Steven Robert McCann appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. McCann argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because: (1) trial counsel failed to argue to the trial court that a proposed jury instruction modification was mandated by the Missouri Approved Criminal Instructions; and (2) appellate counsel failed to raise this issue in Mr. McCann’s appeal.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Steven Robert McCann appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. McCann argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because: (1) trial counsel failed to argue to the trial court that a proposed jury instruction modification was mandated by the Missouri Approved Criminal Instructions; and (2) appellate counsel failed to raise this issue in Mr. McCann’s appeal.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

McCann v. State, 372 S.W.3d 922, 2012 WL 3288677, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 989 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

372 S.W.3d 922 (McCann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.