Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/McCann v. State

McCann v. State

132 S.E.2d 813, 108 Ga. App. 316, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 625
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 16, 1963
Docket40307
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 132 S.E.2d 813 (McCann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCann v. State, 132 S.E.2d 813, 108 Ga. App. 316, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 625 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted and convicted for the offense of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. In charging the jury the trial court instructed them in part as follows: “Further, Gentlemen, I charge you that up until last year when the General Assembly changed this law and it was approved by the Governor, that in Georgia no defendant in any criminal case whether it be felony or misdemeanor could do more than give his statement, without being placed under oath. The law did not permit him to be placed under oath though he might desire so to be. The law at this time, Gentlemen, is this: In addition to the law just given you, the defendant may now, if he elects to do so, be sworn and be cross examined as other witnesses in the case. That, however, Gentlemen, I charge you is another matter entirely within his election, and the fact that this defendant has not elected to be sworn and cross examined and give his testimony under oath, is not to be considered, Gentlemen, as a circumstance unfavorable to1 him for that is a matter wholly for his determination and wholly within his legal rights.” The defendant's amended motion for new trial assigns error on such excerpt of the charge. Held:

*317 Decided September 16, 1963. Guy B. Scott, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Preston M. Almand, Solicitor, contra.

1. The Act of 1962 (Ga. L. 1962, p. 133; Code Arm. § 38-415), expressly provides that no comment shall be made because of the failure of a defendant to testify under oath (see Carter v. State, 107 Ga. App. 571, 130 SE2d 806), and such prohibition applies equally to the court as to the solicitor. Accordingly, the trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s amended motion for new trial which assigned error on such excerpt from the charge.

2. Inasmuch as the case must be again tried and the evidence may not be the same on another trial, the usual general grounds of the motion for new trial are not passed upon.

Judgment reversed.

Frankum and Jordan, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. State
220 S.E.2d 736 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Woodard v. State
218 S.E.2d 629 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Thomas v. State
216 S.E.2d 859 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Linder v. State
208 S.E.2d 630 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Spann v. State
190 S.E.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Jones v. State
180 S.E.2d 603 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Bryant v. State
175 S.E.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Harris v. State
165 S.E.2d 462 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Crowe v. State
161 S.E.2d 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Lackey v. State
159 S.E.2d 188 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Wayne v. State
147 S.E.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Huff v. State
147 S.E.2d 840 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Gunnin v. State
146 S.E.2d 131 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
McDougald v. State
137 S.E.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Ash v. State
135 S.E.2d 507 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Lynch v. State
134 S.E.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E.2d 813, 108 Ga. App. 316, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccann-v-state-gactapp-1963.