McCann v. State

249 So. 3d 792
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 2018·No. Case No. 2D16-812·Published

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

*793Mallory McCann challenges her fifteen-year sentence for armed robbery. We affirm the sentence without comment. However, we agree with McCann's contention that the trial court erred in imposing a $65 assessment pursuant to section 939.185(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2015), because the order assessing costs and fees fails to indicate the applicable county ordinance.1 See Swift v. State, 53 So.3d 394, 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (citing Ayoub v. State, 901 So.2d 311, 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ); Carter v. State, 173 So.3d 1048, 1051 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). We affirm the assessment but remand for the trial court to enter an amended order assessing costs and fees reflecting the applicable county ordinance. See Swift, 53 So.3d at 395.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

ATKINSON, J., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCann v. State, 249 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

249 So. 3d 792 (McCann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ayoub v. State
901 So. 2d 311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Carter v. State
173 So. 3d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Swift v. State
53 So. 3d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)