McCann v. Locks
This text of 160 A.D.2d 688 (McCann v. Locks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant Lance Roger Spodek appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.), entered December 2, 1988, as denied his motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that there are material issues of fact necessitating a trial for their resolution. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion for summary judgment. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 A.D.2d 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccann-v-locks-nyappdiv-1990.