McCandless v. Rodgers

25 S.E. 822, 99 Ga. 636
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 2, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 822 (McCandless v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCandless v. Rodgers, 25 S.E. 822, 99 Ga. 636 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The bill of exceptions in. this case is in many respects so obviously 'defective and incomplete that it presents no question which this court can intelligently consider and pass upon. Judgment affirmed.

Ray & Ray, for plaintiff. Robert L. Rodgers, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winn v. State
53 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 822, 99 Ga. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccandless-v-rodgers-ga-1896.