McCandless v. Rodgers

25 S.E. 822, 99 Ga. 636
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 2, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The bill of exceptions in. this case is in many respects so obviously 'defective and incomplete that it presents no question which this court can intelligently consider and pass upon. Judgment affirmed.

Ray & Ray, for plaintiff. Robert L. Rodgers, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCandless v. Rodgers, 25 S.E. 822, 99 Ga. 636 (Ga. 1896).

25 S.E. 822 (McCandless v. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winn v. State
53 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)