McCandless v. Peterson

104 P. 1135, 55 Wash. 700, 1909 Wash. LEXIS 829
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 16, 1909
DocketNo. 8177
StatusPublished

This text of 104 P. 1135 (McCandless v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCandless v. Peterson, 104 P. 1135, 55 Wash. 700, 1909 Wash. LEXIS 829 (Wash. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover certain property sold on tax foreclosure sale. The facts bring it within the recent cases of Gould v. Knox, 53 Wash. 248, 101 Pac. 886; Gould v. White, 54 Wash. 394, 103 Pac. 460; Gould v. Stanton, 54 Wash. 363, 103 Pac. 459.

The case is therefore reversed, with instructions to the lower court to ascertain the value of the permanent improvements put upon the property by the respondents, and also all amounts paid out in taxes, special taxes, and local assessments, under the provisions of chapter 137, Laws 1903, and to enter judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gould v. Knox
101 P. 886 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Gould v. Stanton
103 P. 459 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Gould v. White
103 P. 460 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 P. 1135, 55 Wash. 700, 1909 Wash. LEXIS 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccandless-v-peterson-wash-1909.