McCandless v. Lansing

19 Haw. 467, 1909 Haw. LEXIS 20
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedMay 27, 1909
DocketNo. 58
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 19 Haw. 467 (McCandless v. Lansing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCandless v. Lansing, 19 Haw. 467, 1909 Haw. LEXIS 20 (haw 1909).

Opinion

Per curiam.

“Whenever any question of law shall arise in any trial or other proceeding before a circuit court, the presiding judge may reserve the same for the consideration of the supreme court.” Sec. 1862 R. L. No question is presented which the judge had not ruled upon. The statute does not authorize this court in answering reserved questions to order such judgment “as is fit and proper for the further disposition of the case” (Mass, [468]*468Pub. St. p. 832), nor, as in eases of exceptions, to vacate a judgment and require such further proceedings “as to law and justice shall appertain.” Sec. 1867 R. L. The circuit judge is advised that no question is presented which this court can consider.

A. Q-. M. Robertson for plaintiff. Castle & Withington for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Estate of Beckley
31 Haw. 150 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1929)
Honolulu Plantation Co. v. Tsunoda
27 Haw. 835 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1924)
Territory v. Scully
22 Haw. 484 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Haw. 467, 1909 Haw. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccandless-v-lansing-haw-1909.