Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McCandless v. Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee

McCandless v. Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee

616 So. 2d 608, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 1993 WL 102151
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 8, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1012
StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 608 (McCandless v. Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCandless v. Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee, 616 So. 2d 608, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 1993 WL 102151 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of an order denying her motion for a new trial. Having reviewed the entire record with care, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. See Stapleton v. Bisignano, 605 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur. ZEHMER, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stapleton v. Bisignano
605 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 608, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 1993 WL 102151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccandless-v-diocese-of-pensacola-tallahassee-fladistctapp-1993.