Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McCandless v. Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee

McCandless v. Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee

616 So. 2d 608, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 1993 WL 102151
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 1993·No. No. 92-1012·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of an order denying her motion for a new trial. Having reviewed the entire record with care, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. See Stapleton v. Bisignano, 605 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur. ZEHMER, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCandless v. Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee, 616 So. 2d 608, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 1993 WL 102151 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 608 (McCandless v. Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stapleton v. Bisignano
605 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)