McCandless v. Campbell

20 Haw. 364
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1911
DocketNo. 26
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Haw. 364 (McCandless v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCandless v. Campbell, 20 Haw. 364 (haw 1911).

Opinion

Per curiam:

This is a bill of exceptions brought by the defendant, and allowed by the circuit judge, from a decision of the circuit judge overruling a demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition for a writ of mandamus. The attention of the defendant having been called by the court to the lack of jurisdiction for bills of exceptions in matters at chambers, he informed the court that he considered that the [365]*365exceptions were not properly brought and ought to bo dismissed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

IV. S. Edings and P. L. Weaver for plaintiff. E. W. Sutton, Deputy Attorney General, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trask v. Shinn
41 Haw. 374 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Haw. 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccandless-v-campbell-haw-1911.