McCampbell v. . McClung

Supreme Court of North Carolina

McCampbell v. . McClung

75 N.C. 392

DecidedJune 5, 1876

StatusPublished

This text of 75 N.C. 392 (McCampbell v. . McClung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCampbell v. . McClung, 75 N.C. 392 (N.C. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

The exceptions to the report for vagueness and uncertainty must be sustained. The parties are entitled, from the referee, to a statement of all the items of the account between them, in order that either may, if he thinks proper, except to any particular item.

Exception to the report for vagueness sustained. Case (395) remanded to be proceeded in.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

Cited: Comrs. v. Maguire, 85 N.C. 117; Gore v. Lewis, 109 N.C. 541;Sharpe v. Eliason, 116 N.C. 667.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The exceptions to the report for vagueness and uncertainty must be sustained. The parties are entitled, from the referee, to a statement of all the items of the account between them, in order that either may, if he thinks proper, except to any particular item.

Exception to the report for vagueness sustained. Case (395) remanded to be proceeded in.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

Cited: Comrs. v. Maguire, 85 N.C. 117; Gore v. Lewis, 109 N.C. 541;Sharpe v. Eliason, 116 N.C. 667.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 N.C. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccampbell-v-mcclung-nc-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack