McCampbell v. McClung
75 N.C. 393
Opinion
The exceptions to the report for vagueness and uncertainty must be sustained. The parties are entitled, from the referee, to a statement of all the items of the account between them, in order that either may, if he thinks proper, except to any particular item.
[395] Exception to the report for vagueness sustained. Judgment below reversed. Case remanded to be proceeded in, &c. Let this opinion be certified. The plaintiff will recover costs in this court.
Per CuriaM. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCampbell v. McClung, 75 N.C. 393 (N.C. 1876).
75 N.C. 393 (McCampbell v. McClung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McElroy v. Whitney
88 P. 349 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1906)
Sharpe v. . Eliason
21 S.E. 401 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
Gore v. . Lewis
13 S.E. 909 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Wake v. Magnin
85 N.C. 114 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)