McCampbell v. Cunard Steamship Co.

New York Supreme Court

McCampbell v. Cunard Steamship Co.

27 N.Y.S. 1112, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 870

New York Supreme Court·Decided February 12, 1894·Published

Opinion

-CULLEN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, entered -on the verdict of a jury. The action was servant against master, to recover for personal injuries suffered owing to the alleged negligence of the defendant. On the first trial of the action, I directed the complaint to be dismissed. On appeal, that decision was reversed. 23 N. Y. Supp. 477. As both my associates concurred in the opinion delivered on appeal which [1113] covers the question now raised, and as the trial court followed the law laid down by the general term, it follows that this judgment must be affirmed. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-CULLEN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, entered -on the verdict of a jury. The action was servant against master, to recover for personal injuries suffered owing to the alleged negligence of the defendant. On the first trial of the action, I directed the complaint to be dismissed. On appeal, that decision was reversed. 23 N. Y. Supp. 477. As both my associates concurred in the opinion delivered on appeal which [1113] covers the question now raised, and as the trial court followed the law laid down by the general term, it follows that this judgment must be affirmed. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

McCampbell v. Cunard Steamship Co., 27 N.Y.S. 1112, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 870 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

27 N.Y.S. 1112 (McCampbell v. Cunard Steamship Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.