McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

896 A.2d 191, 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 141, 2006 WL 722203
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 15, 2006
Docket04-AA-211
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 896 A.2d 191 (McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 896 A.2d 191, 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 141, 2006 WL 722203 (D.C. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of petitioner’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 10, 2005, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s brief shall be filed on or before April 24, 2006, and respondent’s brief shall be filed on or before May 24, 2006. Petitioner may file a reply brief no later than June 8, 2006. Each party shall file ten copies of its briefs. These new briefs shall be specifically designed for consideration by and addressed to the en banc court and shall supersede all briefs previously filed in this appeal. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that any requests for extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and will be granted only upon a showing of good cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
947 A.2d 1191 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
896 A.2d 191, 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 141, 2006 WL 722203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccamey-v-district-of-columbia-department-of-employment-services-dc-2006.