McCamey v. Adelphie Land Co.

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 324
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 3, 1926
DocketNo. 6491
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 324 (McCamey v. Adelphie Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCamey v. Adelphie Land Co., 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 324 (Ohio Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

The Adelphie Land Co. brought this action in Cuyahoga Common Pleas for the cancellation of a land contract, the subject of which was situated in Lorain County.

Oscar- McCamey filed answer and cross .petition, to which the Land company made reply. Under the issues raised by these pleadings, the question arose as to the jurisdiction of the court to try the case.

Judgment in the trial court being for the Company, McCamey prosecuted error. The Court of Appeals held:

1. Action for recovery of real property must be brought in county where property is situated.
2. Action on a land contract can be brought in county where land is situated, or in county where defendant resides.

Judgment therefor affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Domby v. Domby
97 N.E.2d 104 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ohio Law. Abs. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccamey-v-adelphie-land-co-ohioctapp-1926.