McCambridge v. City of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

McCambridge v. City of Little Rock

742 S.W.2d 114, 294 Ark. 126, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2437

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCambridge v. City of Little Rock. Read the opinion of the Court — 298 Ark. 219 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided December 14, 1987·No. 87-352·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We grant the stay as we have done consistently in important cases where serious legal issues are presented to this court. While we may well agree that the photographs requested under the Freedom of Information Act should be made available to the public, this case should be briefed, argued and decided like any important case pending before this court. Therefore, we grant the appellant’s motion to stay pending appeal.

Hickman, Dudley and Hays, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We grant the stay as we have done consistently in important cases where serious legal issues are presented to this court. While we may well agree that the photographs requested under the Freedom of Information Act should be made available to the public, this case should be briefed, argued and decided like any important case pending before this court. Therefore, we grant the appellant’s motion to stay pending appeal.

Hickman, Dudley and Hays, JJ., dissent.

McCambridge v. City of Little Rock, 742 S.W.2d 114, 294 Ark. 126, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2437 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

742 S.W.2d 114 (McCambridge v. City of Little Rock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.