McCallum v. LeValley McLeod, Inc.

111 A.D.2d 978, 490 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50245

This text of 111 A.D.2d 978 (McCallum v. LeValley McLeod, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCallum v. LeValley McLeod, Inc., 111 A.D.2d 978, 490 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Kane, J.

Proceeding initiated in this court pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated December 18, 1984, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice based on age.

The determination should be confirmed. Petitioner’s allegations of discrimination are unsubstantiated and there was proof in the record that petitioner’s layoff was caused by economic problems encountered by her employer (see, Matter of Waddington v General Elec. Co., 103 AD2d 955). Finally, we find the claim that the investigation by the State Division of Human Rights was inadequate lacking in merit.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waddington v. General Electric Co.
103 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A.D.2d 978, 490 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccallum-v-levalley-mcleod-inc-nyappdiv-1985.