McCall's Lessee v. Denny & Lockerman

1 Del. Cas. 397
CourtDelaware Court of Common Pleas
DecidedMay 15, 1796
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 397 (McCall's Lessee v. Denny & Lockerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCall's Lessee v. Denny & Lockerman, 1 Del. Cas. 397 (Del. Super. Ct. 1796).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court have no doubt as to the admissibility of the evidence. The eleventh section of the Act referred to [398]*398by the plaintiff’s counsel must remove any doubt that could arise on the subject.

Bidgely and Bayard for plaintiff. Bead and Miller for defendant.

Survey admitted.

The counsel for the defendants prayed a bill of exceptions,, which was granted but not prosecuted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccalls-lessee-v-denny-lockerman-delctcompl-1796.