McCallister v. Sigler

Indiana Supreme Court

McCallister v. Sigler

18 N.E. 464, 116 Ind. 476, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 163

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 13, 1888

DocketNo. 13,461

StatusPublished

This text of 18 N.E. 464 (McCallister v. Sigler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCallister v. Sigler, 18 N.E. 464, 116 Ind. 476, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 163 (Ind. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The appellee claimed the property in controversy as exempt from execution. This claim is resisted by the appellants on the ground that the property was partnership property, and can not be claimed under the exemption law. We can not sustain the appellants’ contention, for there is evidence showing that the property belonged to the appellee, and not to the firm of which he was a member.

The case falls within the rule that the finding of the trial court will not be disturbed where there is evidence sustaining it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, J.

The appellee claimed the property in controversy as exempt from execution. This claim is resisted by the appellants on the ground that the property was partnership property, and can not be claimed under the exemption law. We can not sustain the appellants’ contention, for there is evidence showing that the property belonged to the appellee, and not to the firm of which he was a member.

The case falls within the rule that the finding of the trial court will not be disturbed where there is evidence sustaining it.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 N.E. 464, 116 Ind. 476, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccallister-v-sigler-ind-1888.