McCall v. . Sustair

76 S.E. 527, 161 N.C. 213, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 396
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 11, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 S.E. 527 (McCall v. . Sustair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCall v. . Sustair, 76 S.E. 527, 161 N.C. 213, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 396 (N.C. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

We have considered carefully the petition to rehear in this case and the briefs filed by the learned counsel for the plaintiff in support of it, as well as those filed by the defendant.

The majority of the Court is of opinion that no authority was overlooked in the opinion of the Chief Justice and that no question has been raised by the petition to rehear which was not considered on the former hearing.

We are of opinion that the ease was fully covered by the opinion of the Chief Justice, affirming the judgment of his Honor, Judge Biggs.

The petition to rehear is dismissed.

Walker, J., and IIoke, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.
195 S.E. 55 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E. 527, 161 N.C. 213, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-sustair-nc-1912.