Home/Superior Court of Delaware/McCall v. Stern

McCall v. Stern

105 A. 666, 30 Del. 233, 7 Boyce 233, 1919 Del. LEXIS 17
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedFebruary 12, 1919
DocketAction of Replevin, No. 59
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 A. 666 (McCall v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCall v. Stern, 105 A. 666, 30 Del. 233, 7 Boyce 233, 1919 Del. LEXIS 17 (Del. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Where it appears that the officer in charge of the execution of the writ of replevin refused to give reasonable time to the defendant in the writ to give property bond and retain possession of the goods pending the action of replevin, the court -will direct to be issued a unit of de retorno habendo pendente lite, upon the entering of proper and sufficient security by the defendant in the writ of replevin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Gould
113 A. 900 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A. 666, 30 Del. 233, 7 Boyce 233, 1919 Del. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-stern-delsuperct-1919.