McCall v. Stern
105 A. 666, 30 Del. 233, 7 Boyce 233, 1919 Del. LEXIS 17
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided February 12, 1919·No. Action of Replevin, No. 59·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Where it appears that the officer in charge of the execution of the writ of replevin refused to give reasonable time to the defendant in the writ to give property bond and retain possession of the goods pending the action of replevin, the court -will direct to be issued a unit of de retorno habendo pendente lite, upon the entering of proper and sufficient security by the defendant in the writ of replevin.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCall v. Stern, 105 A. 666, 30 Del. 233, 7 Boyce 233, 1919 Del. LEXIS 17 (Del. Ct. App. 1919).
105 A. 666 (McCall v. Stern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Gould
113 A. 900 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1921)