McCall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McCall v. State

481 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 124, 2016 WL 615828

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 16, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102666

StatusPublished

This text of 481 S.W.3d 892 (McCall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCall v. State, 481 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 124, 2016 WL 615828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darrin McCall appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule '29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum [893]*893for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darrin McCall appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule '29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum [893]*893for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 124, 2016 WL 615828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-state-moctapp-2016.