McCall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McCall v. State

481 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 124, 2016 WL 615828

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 2016·No. No. ED 102666·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darrin McCall appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule '29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum [893] for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darrin McCall appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule '29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum [893] for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

McCall v. State, 481 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 124, 2016 WL 615828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

481 S.W.3d 892 (McCall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.