McCall v. State
This text of 162 So. 2d 526 (McCall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appealed order, denying application for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, was predicated on insufficiency of allegation in the motion for relief and must be affirmed. See Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766. Since the disposition of the motion in the lower court did not reach the merits of appellant’s claim, the order and our affirmance are without prejudice to any subsequent proceedings on proper motion under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 So. 2d 526, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-state-fladistctapp-1964.