McCall v. State

152 So. 19, 113 Fla. 469, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1710
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 So. 19 (McCall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCall v. State, 152 So. 19, 113 Fla. 469, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1710 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Davis, C. J.

Luke McCall was convicted in the Circuit Court of Madison County of manslaughter and sentenced therefor to six years confinement in State prison. The evidence in the case shows that defendant shot deceased three times and that while deceased was prostrate on the ground a.nd helpless, that he then cut his throat. The indictment charged murder in the first degree by shooting and cutting, the charge of murder being stated in only one count in the indictment. The defendant admitted the killing, but claimed the right to' be acquitted on the ground of self defense..

If there was error in denying defendant’s motion to require the State,to, elect on whether it would rely on proof of the shooting or cutting of deceased’s throat, as the proximate cause of death, it was rendered harmless by the fact that there was ample evidence produced by the State from which the jury could have reasonably inferred that death resulted from a concurrence'-pf- the shooting and cutting with a knife specifying in the indictment.

■ , The trial judge gave the jury what was perhaps his usual '“stereotyped” form of jury charge which embraces some abstract statements of homicide law not applicable to the •facts shown in the present case. Likewise the court refused one or more special charges requested by defendant which, undoubtedly, out of the abundance of caution to safeguard the defendant’s rights, might have been more properly given than refused under the circumstances' appearing at the trial.

*471 But a consideration of the entire record shows that the evidence of guilt is clear, and that no fundamental rights of the accused were violated. Therefore, the conviction, which is of a lesser degree of homicide than the evidence would have sustained, should not be reversed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis and Bufobd, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cornelius v. State
49 So. 2d 332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 19, 113 Fla. 469, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-state-fla-1934.