McCall v. Matondo
297 A.D.2d 397, 746 N.Y.2d 619, 746 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8147
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 28, 2002
StatusPublished
This text of 297 A.D.2d 397 (McCall v. Matondo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCall v. Matondo, 297 A.D.2d 397, 746 N.Y.2d 619, 746 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
The Supreme Court correctly found that the proceeding was untimely (see Election Law § 16-102 [2]).
The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Florio, McGinity, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 16-102
New York ELN § 16-102
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 397, 746 N.Y.2d 619, 746 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-matondo-nyappdiv-2002.