McCall v. Elliott

Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon

McCall v. Elliott

3 Or. 138

CourtMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon

DecidedNovember 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Or. 138 (McCall v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCall v. Elliott, 3 Or. 138 (Or. Super. Ct. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Upton, J.

instructed the jury that the burden of proof was on the defendant to show that he contracted as agent for others in employing the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff had notice of such agency; and that the plaintiff was entitled [139]*139to a verdict, unless the proof either showed such agency and sucb knowledge on tbe part of the plaintiff of the defendant’s being agent, or established the making of the special contract as to the mode of compensation, which is set forth in the answer.

The plaintiff had a verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upton, J.

instructed the jury that the burden of proof was on the defendant to show that he contracted as agent for others in employing the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff had notice of such agency; and that the plaintiff was entitled [139]*139to a verdict, unless the proof either showed such agency and sucb knowledge on tbe part of the plaintiff of the defendant’s being agent, or established the making of the special contract as to the mode of compensation, which is set forth in the answer.

The plaintiff had a verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Or. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-elliott-orccmultnomah-1869.