McCall v. Crocker

South Dakota Supreme Court

McCall v. Crocker

153 N.W. 761, 35 S.D. 600, 1915 S.D. LEXIS 92

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 16, 1915

DocketFile No. 3694

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 153 N.W. 761 (McCall v. Crocker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCall v. Crocker, 153 N.W. 761, 35 S.D. 600, 1915 S.D. LEXIS 92 (S.D. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

GATES, J.

Appellants’ brief contains no- assignment of errors. There is therefore nothing before us for consideration. Attention was called to this defect by respondent, and, although appellants filed a reply brief, the defect was not remedied.'

The order appealed from is therefore affirmed. Sorg. v. Wells, 33 S. D. 142, 144 N. W. 918; State v. Johns, 25 S. D. 451, 127 N. W. 470; Williams Bros. Lumber Co. v. Kelly, 23 S. D. 582, 122 N. W. 646; chapter 172, Laws 1913; Supreme Court rule S (140 N. W. viii).

POLLEY, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GATES, J.

Appellants’ brief contains no- assignment of errors. There is therefore nothing before us for consideration. Attention was called to this defect by respondent, and, although appellants filed a reply brief, the defect was not remedied.'

The order appealed from is therefore affirmed. Sorg. v. Wells, 33 S. D. 142, 144 N. W. 918; State v. Johns, 25 S. D. 451, 127 N. W. 470; Williams Bros. Lumber Co. v. Kelly, 23 S. D. 582, 122 N. W. 646; chapter 172, Laws 1913; Supreme Court rule S (140 N. W. viii).

POLLEY, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 N.W. 761, 35 S.D. 600, 1915 S.D. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-crocker-sd-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack