McCall v. Crocker
153 N.W. 761, 35 S.D. 600, 1915 S.D. LEXIS 92
Opinion
Appellants’ brief contains no- assignment of errors. There is therefore nothing before us for consideration. Attention was called to this defect by respondent, and, although appellants filed a reply brief, the defect was not remedied.'
The order appealed from is therefore affirmed. Sorg. v. Wells, 33 S. D. 142, 144 N. W. 918; State v. Johns, 25 S. D. 451, 127 N. W. 470; Williams Bros. Lumber Co. v. Kelly, 23 S. D. 582, 122 N. W. 646; chapter 172, Laws 1913; Supreme Court rule S (140 N. W. viii).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCall v. Crocker, 153 N.W. 761, 35 S.D. 600, 1915 S.D. LEXIS 92 (S.D. 1915).
153 N.W. 761 (McCall v. Crocker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meeker v. City of Madison
164 N.W. 974 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1917)
La Crosse Rubber Mills Co. v. Dakota Wholesale Coffee Co.
154 N.W. 447 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)
Sigler v. Lehr
153 N.W. 935 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)