McCall v. Cone
197 So. 768, 144 Fla. 98, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1013
Opinions
This cause having heretofore been sub *99 mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCall v. Cone, 197 So. 768, 144 Fla. 98, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1013 (Fla. 1940).
197 So. 768 (McCall v. Cone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walling and American Surety Co. v. Carlton
147 So. 236 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Thomas v. Martin Ex Rel. Thomas
129 So. 602 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
National Surety Corp. v. Sholtz
166 So. 213 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Morrisette v. Wood
128 Ala. 505 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1900)
Anti-Kalsomine Co. v. Kent Circuit Judge
78 N.W. 467 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Transportation Co. v. Standard Oil Co.
40 S.E. 591 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1902)