McCall v. Berkeley County Sheriff
This text of McCall v. Berkeley County Sheriff (McCall v. Berkeley County Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6008
SEAN MCCALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF; BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; BERKELEY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-02-2448-2-18)
Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 20, 2004
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean McCall, Appellant Pro Se. James Albert Stuckey, Jr., Alexia Pittas-Giroux, STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Sean McCall appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and related state tort claims. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See McCall v. Berkeley County Sheriff, No. CA-02-2448-2-18
(D.S.C. Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McCall v. Berkeley County Sheriff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-berkeley-county-sheriff-ca4-2004.