McCalister v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

McCalister v. State

682 So. 2d 556, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 492, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1872, 1996 WL 648182

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 1996

DocketNo. 87238

StatusPublished

This text of 682 So. 2d 556 (McCalister v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCalister v. State, 682 So. 2d 556, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 492, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1872, 1996 WL 648182 (Fla. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review McCalister v. State, 664 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinion in Montague v. State, 656 So.2d 508 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently quashed the decision in Montague and held that a contemporaneous objection is necessary to preserve a Karchesky error for appellate review. State v. Montague, 682 So.2d 1085 (Fla.1996). Therefore, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI